AI vs Digital Manual Tracing in Cephalometric Analysis: University of Pavia Trial Seeks to Validate Automated Systems for Orthodontic Diagnosis

References

1. 1.University of Pavia. (2025). Cephalometric tracing: A comparison between digital analysis and artificial intelligence (NCT07664488). ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07664488
2. 2.Dot, G., Schouman, T., Chang, S., Dubois, G., Rouch, P., & Gajny, L. (2022). Fully automatic cephalometric landmark detection on native and implant-containing radiographs using deep learning. European Radiology, 32(8), 5537–5546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08901-x
3. 3.Gupta, A., Kharbanda, O. P., Sardana, V., Balachandran, R., & Sardana, H. K. (2015). A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 10(11), 1737–1752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1173-6
4. 4.Kılıç, M. C., Bayrakdar, İ. Ş., Çelik, Ö., Bilgir, E., Orhan, K., Aydın, O. B., Kaplan, F. A., Sağlam, H., Odabaş, A., Aslan, A. F., Oztekin, G., Kuhl, C., & Jagtap, R. (2021). Artificial intelligence system for automatic deciduous tooth detection and numbering in panoramic radiographs. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology, 50(5), 20200172. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20200172
5. 5.Lagravère, M. O., & Flores-Mir, C. (2005). The treatment effects of Herbst appliance on skeletal, dental, and soft-tissue changes: A systematic review. Journal of the American Dental Association, 136(7), 989–998. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0264
6. 6.Nair, M. K., & Nair, U. P. (2007). Digital and advanced imaging in endodontics: A review. Journal of Endodontics, 33(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.09.019