AI-Based Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool Enters Clinical Validation Study — Implications for Australian Genetic Screening Pathways
247 Health News Editorial
·20 May 2026
·3 min read
·clinical-trialsThe STAR-BREAST study is validating an AI-powered tool that uses WhatsApp to collect family history and predict breast cancer genetic risk. This Brazilian research could transform genetic screening accessibility and efficiency globally.
Originally reported by ClinicalTrials.gov
References
- 1.AstraZeneca. (2024). Screening Tool Artificial Intelligence-based for Predicting the Genetic Risk of BREAST Cancer (STAR-BREAST) [Clinical trial registration NCT07070128]. ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07070128
- 2.Australian Government Department of Health. (2023). Medicare Benefits Schedule - Genetic Counselling and Testing. Medicare Benefits Schedule. http://www.mbsonline.gov.au
- 3.Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L., ... & de Vet, H. C. (2015). STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ, 351, h5527. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h5527
- 4.Forrest, L. E., Burke, J., Bacic, S., & Amor, D. J. (2008). Increased genetic counseling support improves communication of genetic information in families. Genetics in Medicine, 10(3), 167-172. https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e31816b64c6
- 5.Knoppers, B. M., Zawati, M. H., & Senecal, K. (2015). Return of genetic testing results in the era of whole-genome sequencing. Nature Reviews Genetics, 16(9), 553-559. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3960
- 6.Kuchenbaecker, K. B., Hopper, J. L., Barnes, D. R., Phillips, K. A., Mooij, T. M., Roos-Blom, M. J., ... & Olsson, H. (2017). Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. JAMA, 317(23), 2402-2416. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.7112
- 7.Manchanda, R., Burnell, M., Gaba, F., Desai, R., Wardle, J., Gessler, S., ... & Jacobs, I. (2018). Cost-effectiveness of population screening for BRCA mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish women compared with family history-based testing. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 110(5), 540-541. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djx01
- 8.Rutjes, A. W., Reitsma, J. B., Di Nisio, M., Smidt, N., van Rijn, J. C., & Bossuyt, P. M. (2006). Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies. CMAJ, 174(4), 469-476. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.050090
- 9.Schwartz, M. D., Valdimarsdottir, H. B., Peshkin, B. N., Mandelblatt, J. S., Nusbaum, R., Huang, A. T., ... & King, L. (2014). Randomized trial of a decision aid for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 32(36), 4113-4120. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.51.1079
- 10.Therapeutic Goods Administration. (2023). Software as Medical Device: Guidance for Industry. TGA Guidelines. https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/resource/guidance/software-medical-device-guidance-industry
2
247 Health News Editorial
247 Health News is a medical intelligence platform delivering evidence-based research appraisals, clinical trial monitoring, and health technology news for healthcare professionals.
Related Articles
clinical-trials
Digital Health Platform vs Case Manager Support in Hypertension Management: Taiwan's 1,726-Participant Trial Signals a Shift in Blood Pressure Care Delivery
3 Aug 2026
clinical-trials
Phase II Trial: AI-Powered Wysa Chatbot vs Unmet Need — Digital Eating Disorder Prevention in At-Risk Adolescents
3 Aug 2026
clinical-trials
Pilot Trial Targets the Inpatient-to-Outpatient Gap: Digital Smoking Cessation Intervention for Persons With Serious Mental Illness — Key Findings for Clinicians
3 Aug 2026
This content is for educational purposes for healthcare professionals only and does not constitute clinical advice. Clinical decisions should be based on individual patient assessment, current guidelines, and appropriate specialist consultation. Editorial Standards · Privacy Policy · Terms of Service